Albert Einstein, in a Critique of German Christianity’s Alliance With the Nazis, Believes That Truly Religious People “never made evil compromises and are always guided by their conscience”

Later in life, faced with the results of war and the existential threat of nuclear weapons, he finds likeminded peace activists among the Quakers, who he felt set the religious example above all others in international life

  • Currency:
  • USD
  • GBP
  • JPY
  • EUR
  • CNY
  • Info IconThis currency selector is for viewing only.
    The Raab Collection only accepts USD payments at checkout.
    Exchange rates are updated hourly. Rates may be inaccurate.
Purchase $24,000

An increasingly uncommon letter of Einstein on the role of religions, philosophy, peace, and the dangers of the atomic age (that he helped usher in)

Albert Einstein believed that wars stood in the way of human progress, and he was a lifelong pacifist (though he did not believe in pacifism at any...

Read More

Albert Einstein, in a Critique of German Christianity’s Alliance With the Nazis, Believes That Truly Religious People “never made evil compromises and are always guided by their conscience”

Later in life, faced with the results of war and the existential threat of nuclear weapons, he finds likeminded peace activists among the Quakers, who he felt set the religious example above all others in international life

An increasingly uncommon letter of Einstein on the role of religions, philosophy, peace, and the dangers of the atomic age (that he helped usher in)

Albert Einstein believed that wars stood in the way of human progress, and he was a lifelong pacifist (though he did not believe in pacifism at any price or in all situations). He was also an active promoter of world peace, from the days of World War I right up to his death in 1955. In fact, one of his last acts before his death was to add his signature to a statement of nine scientists warning that the world risked universal annihilation unless the institution of war was abolished. Knowing his stance, people from all over the world appealed to him to assist various causes consistent with these beliefs, and to give statements supporting individuals and groups that did so.

Einstein was also not a member or follower of any organized religion. He considered himself a Jew, but was not a practicing Jew. And as for the Christian churches, he felt that it “since Constantine has always favored the authoritarian State, as long as the State allows the Church to baptize and instruct the masses”. Their conduct in the years up to World War II was worse than disappointing, he thought, as they made the devil’s bargain – the evil compromise – with the Hitler regime. Einstein addressed this saying, “Since when can one make a pact with Christ and Satan at the same time?” He added, “The Church has always sold itself to those in power, and agreed to any bargain in return for immunity…If I were allowed to give advice to the Churches, I would tell them to begin with a conversion among themselves, and to stop playing power politics.” This idea of an evil compromise or devil’s pact is central to his feelings about organized religion.

There was one exception to his criticism of religions – the Quakers. Their community aims at purifying the Christian world and generating social reform by creating direct experience with God, without intervention of clergy or other expressions of church. The Quakers greatly influenced science and industry, and their community is noted for the pursuit of peace and non-violence. Thus Einstein’s views fit into their belief system. “If I were not a Jew I would be a Quaker,” he once wrote. Speaking to a Quaker gathering in 1938, he said, “With admiration and respect I have seen, in the course of many years, how successfully and selflessly the Society of Friends has worked in the entire world to lessen human suffering and to make the teachings of Christ apply to real life. Everyone who is concerned about a better lot and a more dignified stature for humanity owes deep gratitude to the Society of Friends. This Society is an admirable testimony against the assertion that every organization by its very nature kills the spirit which has called it into life.”

In 1949 the Australian pathologist Alton R. Chapple, who was a Quaker, wrote to Einstein, in the then-current climate of concern regarding the perils of the atomic age, for “a few words of leadership and hope”. Einstein responded, stressing the necessity for moral courage by the individual. He said that power is often in the hands of power-loving persons who know very little restrictions when it comes to the realization of their ambitious goals; and answering negatively the question whether self-restraint on what “productive thinkers and explorers” research might not prevent further development of means of mass destruction. He gave three main reasons: 1) The already existing means of destruction are effective enough to bring about total destruction; 2) People really devoted to the progress of knowledge concerning the physical world like Faraday or Rutherford have never worked for practical goals, let alone military goals. And nobody could know in advance what kind of application might be developed on the basis of their discoveries; and 3) People of technical skill are so numerous and so dependent economically that they cannot be expected to refuse employment offered them by the state or private industry, even if they were able to clearly recognize that their work will lead to disaster on a world-wide scale. He concluded that hope can only be based on the intellectual and moral independence of a sufficient number of people, since “honesty and courage of the individual to stand up for his convictions on every occasion is the only essential thing”.

Chapple wrote Einstein again in 1954, about the Quakers, and a perceived contradiction that Chapple discerned in the 1949 letter, thinking that Einstein stated that he does not expect people to refuse to work in research that generates knowledge for the means of mass destruction. Einstein responded to Chapple, giving a virtual primer on his world view and opinions on how a religion and religious individuals could live a moral life and contribute something valuable to society and the cause of peace. This he felt the Quakers did.

Typed letter signed, on his blind-embossed letterhead, Princeton, February 23, 1954, to Alton Chapple in Australia, illuminating Einstein’s judgment and standards of conduct. “Thank you for your letter of February 16th. I consider the Society of Friends the religious community which has the highest moral standards. As far as I know they have never made evil compromises and are always guided by their conscience. In international life, especially, their influence seems to me to be very beneficial and effective.

“There seems to me to be no contradiction in my remarks in my former letter to you. The rules applying to a moral elite can not be expected to be followed by the rank and file.” 

So here Einstein praises those religions with “the highest moral standards”. He especially lays out the need for them, and for individuals, to avoid “evil” compromises, and to always be guided by conscience. If an individual does these things, or a dedicated group like the Quakers, they will gain influence that is both beneficial and effective. Einstein does stand by his statement in the 1949 letter, maintaining that from his experience moral elites lead, and that those in rank and file don’t necessarily follow that lead. In a sense, he is saying that an ethical elite, exercising leadership, has the best chance of saving the world.

An increasingly uncommon letter of Einstein on philosophy, peace, the role of religions and religious individuals, and the dangers of the atomic age (that he helped usher in).

Purchase $24,000

Frame, Display, Preserve

Each frame is custom constructed, using only proper museum archival materials. This includes:The finest frames, tailored to match the document you have chosen. These can period style, antiqued, gilded, wood, etc. Fabric mats, including silk and satin, as well as museum mat board with hand painted bevels. Attachment of the document to the matting to ensure its protection. This "hinging" is done according to archival standards. Protective "glass," or Tru Vue Optium Acrylic glazing, which is shatter resistant, 99% UV protective, and anti-reflective. You benefit from our decades of experience in designing and creating beautiful, compelling, and protective framed historical documents.

Learn more about our Framing Services